Veuillez sélectionner votre région et votre langue pour continuer :
Please select your region and language to continue:
We use cookies
Respecting your privacy is important to us. We use cookies to personalize our content and your digital experience. Their use is also useful to us for statistical and marketing purposes. Some cookies are collected with your consent. If you would like to know more about cookies, how to prevent their installation and change your browser settings, click here.
April 2026
Energy prices and financial markets continue to adjust to an increasingly uncertain geopolitical backdrop following the escalation of the Middle East conflict. The price of Brent and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) exceeded $100 per barrel, as of April 7th, as investors factored in the potential for a prolonged supply disruption.
While the conflict has weighed negatively on market sentiment and contributed to higher energy costs, the ultimate impact on global economic activity remains uncertain, given the unknown duration and scope of the war. As outlined in our latest Capital Markets and Economic Outlook, our base case is for world real GDP to advance by 3.0% in 2026, compared to 3.3% in 2025. The potential for economic and energy disruption varies across regions, as discussed in our March Portfolio Update edition.
Equity market performance has been divergent since the onset of the conflict, while bonds have provided modest stability. As of March 31st, 2026, the S&P 500 returned -2.6% (total return in Canadian dollar terms), the MSCI ACWI -1.5%, the MSCI EAFE 0.5%, the MSCI Emerging Markets 1.6%, and the S&P/TSX 3.9%. As we have long cautioned, elevated valuations and aggressive earnings expectations make equity indexes particularly sensitive to shifts in sentiment, a risk that is amplified in periods of geopolitical tension.
To assess the potential economic implications of the escalation of the Middle East conflict, we have examined the relationship between global oil expenditures and economic activity.
In 2025, global oil expenditure, measured as total oil demand multiplied by the nominal Brent crude price, represented approximately 2.3% of global GDP according to EIA and World Bank data, with Brent averaging $69 per barrel over the year. Oil futures markets currently imply an average Brent price of $92 per barrel for calendar year 2026. The impact from a potential 33% rise in average annual oil prices would be to increase global spending on oil by 0.8% to 3.1% of global GDP (Chart 1).
By comparison, significantly higher price levels would be required to approach historical periods of economic stress. Brent would need to sustain an annual average of $150 per barrel for the oil consumption expenditure to GDP ratio to reach the 5.0% high recorded in 2011-2012. A spike to $210 per barrel would propel the ratio to the all-time high of 7.3% achieved in 1979.
Although recent increases in oil prices are noteworthy, a more pronounced and sustained rise would be required to materially impact global growth. The effects would likely be felt most acutely in Asia, which receives approximately 85% of Middle Eastern oil exports, compared to North America, which remains largely self-sufficient in both oil and natural gas.
We continue to monitor company-specific developments and conduct stress testing on our holdings in light of potential risks stemming from macroeconomic and geopolitical shocks. Sectors and industries such as aviation remain a focus given their sensitivity to energy costs and demand fluctuations.
Air Canada illustrates these considerations. While futures markets do not currently anticipate a sustained period of elevated oil prices, the recent sharp increase in jet fuel prices is still significant. If jet fuel prices were to double from current levels, airlines would need to raise fares by more than 20% to fully offset the impact, which would likely dampen demand. Air Canada has hedged approximately 20% of its near-term fuel needs, providing some protection. However, we still expect near-term margin pressure driven by higher fuel costs and softer demand from higher air fares and weaker consumer confidence. At the same time, the company benefits from a strong competitive position in the Canadian market, supported by its hub network. Its Aeroplan loyalty program also contributes a more stable and higher-margin revenue stream relative to core passenger operations.
Despite these near-term headwinds, our investment thesis remains intact. The stock entered this period at a reasonable valuation and now trades at roughly 8 times 2027 consensus earnings per share as of March 31st. We continue to see a path for earnings to more than double over the next three to five years, supported by an eventual normalization in fuel prices and operating leverage driven by its fleet renewal program. The recent share price decline of approximately 20% appears to reflect a meaningful portion of these near-term pressures, and we maintain conviction over the medium to long term.
Periods of market dislocation also surface opportunities to deploy capital in high-quality businesses at attractive prices. In this context, a position was recently initiated in Microsoft. The investment was made at an attractive entry point, with the stock trading at approximately 20 times earnings, excluding non-cash gains from its OpenAI investment. Azure AI services and the rapid adoption of Microsoft 365 Copilot are expected to drive earnings growth in excess of 20% this year. By successfully integrating generative AI across its cloud infrastructure and productivity software, we believe Microsoft has established itself as one of the primary beneficiaries of the current technological cycle.
The severity and duration of the Middle East conflict remain highly uncertain, and the ultimate impact on economies and capital markets will depend on how energy supply disruptions evolve from here. Prolonged tensions have the potential to sustain higher energy prices and inflationary pressures, weighing on global growth and contributing to increased market volatility, with consequences that will vary across regions, industries, and asset classes.
In this environment, we consider the defensive characteristics of our portfolios to be well suited to navigate uncertainty. Our equity holdings are anchored in high-quality companies with solid fundamentals, and our bond portfolio maintains a strong credit quality. Together, these attributes position our portfolios to weather near-term volatility while remaining attentive to opportunities that may emerge as conditions evolve.
We continue to monitor events closely and will reassess our views as further information becomes available.
Subscribe to Letko Brosseau’s newsletter and other publications:
Start a conversation with one of our Directors, Investment Services, a Letko Brosseau Partner who is experienced at working with high net worth private clients.