Veuillez sélectionner votre région et votre langue pour continuer :
Please select your region and language to continue:
We use cookies
Respecting your privacy is important to us. We use cookies to personalize our content and your digital experience. Their use is also useful to us for statistical and marketing purposes. Some cookies are collected with your consent. If you would like to know more about cookies, how to prevent their installation and change your browser settings, click here.
December 21, 2021
The consumption of fossil fuels has resulted in vastly improved standards of living over the past 150 years, yet there is no denying that it has also contributed to global warming which, left unchecked, will likely result in devastating consequences. As portfolio managers, we must consider the long-term ramifications of responding to the challenges climate change poses to our industries and our holdings. The answer is not as simple as “divesting or not divesting” from oil stocks. This is a complicated global dilemma. We are devoting more time and research effort to exploring likely pathways to net zero emissions and the impact it may have on our portfolio decisions. We intend to share with you our findings in a series of upcoming research reports.
Last month, the 26th Annual United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26) set out a goal to limit warming of the earth’s atmosphere to 1.5°C above preindustrial levels. Over 200 nations revisited climate pledges made under the 2015 Paris Agreement, presented their plans to cut greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2030 and committed to reaching net zero emissions by 2050. The result: The Glasgow Climate Pact, an agreement for countries to strengthen near-term climate targets and accelerate the move away from fossil fuels.
Corporations have a role to play in transitioning to a lower carbon economy. According to surveys conducted by The Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit and Oxford University, 21% of the world’s largest 2,000 companies have committed to net zero by 2050. The surveys also show that pledges for net zero by 2050 have been made by countries and corporations that account for 61% of global GHG emissions, 60% of global GDP and 56% of the world’s population.
While governments and corporations are vested in finding solutions, each industry has its own unique set of challenges. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), electricity and heat generation is responsible for 32% of global CO2 emissions. The reduced cost of renewable power, including solar and wind, creates viable alternatives to coal and natural gas power generation. However, renewable energy requires baseload power or grid-scale battery storage to ensure consistent and dependable energy supply. Battery technology is still in the early stages of full-scale application, and baseload power will continue to be supplied from fossil fuels. Nuclear power could serve as a primary or baseload energy source, but waste disposal remains a key question and public perception is a deterrent. The move towards natural gas, a lower-emission fossil fuel, can help bridge the transition towards net zero.
In the transportation sector, responsible for 14% of global CO2 emissions, the increasing adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) works to reduce our use of gasoline and diesel to power our cars and trucks. As explained in our comprehensive report “The climate is changing. Electric vehicles are coming. Should we still invest in oil?”, oil is a fossil fuel that accounts for around one-third of global CO2 emissions annually. Reducing our consumption is key to limiting global warming to 1.5°C. While the world’s largest asset managers are pledging to reduce their portfolios’ carbon footprint by divesting away from fossil fuels, we believe the solution is more nuanced than some may be prepared to acknowledge. We cannot ignore the fact that fossil fuels remain intricately engrained in our daily lives. Undoing our dependence will inflict tremendous costs and hardship, particularly in the developing world, where energy needs are great and resources are scarce.
Industrial processes are responsible for 19% of global CO2 emissions. New and alternative methods of production help to reduce CO2 from emission-heavy products, such as cement and steel. However, this will involve significant financial investment and reconfiguration of industrial infrastructure and retrofitting of plants. In the case of steel, it will likely require the rebuilding of a significant portion of the global production base. In addition, not all emissions can be reduced with current technologies. Net-zero targets are reliant on carbon capture and storage to mitigate the balance. While promising progress is being made on this front, the technology is in the very early stages of commercialization and will require significant capital for global applications.
Our Climate Change Committee plays an active role in identifying investment risks and opportunities arising from climate change, both in our portfolios and, more broadly, in capital markets. Comprised of a cross-section of our firm’s portfolio managers and investment professionals, the Committee conducts climate change scenario analysis, beginning with potential global physical changes and how these, in-turn, impact the macroeconomic environment, government policy, regulation, sector and industry dynamics, and individual company performance.
In the New Year, we will introduce a new series of reports focusing on our Net Zero Emissions research. We will explore various topics, including the science behind climate change, the largest sources of emissions, and the potential pathways to mitigating global warming. We intend to take a deeper dive into the concept of net zero and will share the conclusions that directly inform our investment analysis and portfolio strategy.
Our role as an investment manager is multilayered. On the one hand, we want to participate in efforts to limit global warming through company engagement, and be at the forefront of socially responsible investments. On the other hand, it is important that we remain clear-eyed and fully understand the economic, scientific, social and political implications of the transition to a lower-carbon economy, all while fulfilling our fiduciary duty to earn a sustainable return on your investments. We invite you to join us as we unpack these complex issues in our upcoming Net Zero series.
The information and opinions expressed herein are provided for informational purposes only, are subject to change and are not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for, accounting, legal or tax advice or investment recommendations. Unless otherwise indicated, information included herein is presented as of the dates indicated. While the information presented herein is believed to be accurate at the time it is prepared, Letko, Brosseau & Associates Inc. cannot give any assurance that it is accurate, complete and current at all times.
Where the information contained in this presentation has been obtained or derived from third-party sources, the information is from sources believed to be reliable, but the firm has not independently verified such information. No representation or warranty is provided in relation to the accuracy, correctness, completeness or reliability of such information. Any opinions or estimates contained herein constitute our judgment as of this date and are subject to change without notice.
Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns. All investments pose the risk of loss and there is no guarantee that any of the benefits expressed herein will be achieved or realized.
The information provided herein does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information.
This presentation may contain certain forward-looking statements which reflect our current expectations or forecasts of future events concerning the economy, market changes and trends. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to, among other things, risks, uncertainties and assumptions regarding currencies, economic growth, current and expected conditions, and other factors that are believed to be appropriate in the circumstances which could cause actual events, results, performance or prospects to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.
Subscribe to Letko Brosseau’s newsletter and other publications:
Start a conversation with one of our Directors, Investment Services, a Letko Brosseau Partner who is experienced at working with high net worth private clients.